The purpose of this worksheet is to turn a broad model-name search into a decision that can be checked, quoted and handed over without silently changing assumptions.
Match comparable versions
Record model year, market, engine, gearbox, steering side and equipment for each vehicle. A comparison between different generations or homologation markets can answer the wrong question.
Record: Save the source, capture date and VIN reference beside this finding so another candidate cannot inherit it by mistake.
Evaluate urban priorities
Consider parking size, visibility, ride, air conditioning, phone connection, luggage and rear-seat use. Test the actual equipment rather than awarding points from a generic global brochure.
Record: Enter the verified value and the evidence owner. If the seller supplied the answer, label it seller-stated until independently checked.
Check transmission preference
An X3 Pro manual or CVT and the selected ZS gearbox require separate service questions. Review fluid history, behaviour, diagnostics and local repair capability before treating any automatic as equivalent.
Record: Record what was inspected, what remained inaccessible and who performed the check; silence is an open item, not a pass.
Map destination support
Count realistic service options, diagnostic tools, parts lead times and trusted suppliers. A broader brand network may add value, but only if it supports the exact imported version.
Record: Note every destination assumption behind this conclusion and reopen it when the port, buyer country or registration route changes.
Compare safety evidence
Airbag count, stability control, camera, sensors and child-seat provisions vary by trim. Confirm fitted functions physically and through the correct specification source.
Record: Attach the supporting photograph, report page or document reference and preserve the original language where translation could alter meaning.
Use a scored shortlist
Score identity confidence, condition, essential equipment, support, preparation and landed cost. Keep subjective styling separate so it does not conceal a documentation or condition gap.
Record: State the commercial consequence: accept, reject, reprice or request more evidence, together with the person responsible and deadline.
Close the note with a decision record
Write the selected candidate, rejected alternatives, evidence reviewed, unresolved questions, responsible person and next deadline. If another vehicle replaces the candidate, reopen identity, inspection, cost and destination checks. A copied conclusion is not valid for a different VIN.
- Match comparable versions: confirmed / open / not applicable
- Evaluate urban priorities: confirmed / open / not applicable
- Check transmission preference: confirmed / open / not applicable
- Map destination support: confirmed / open / not applicable
- Compare safety evidence: confirmed / open / not applicable
- Use a scored shortlist: confirmed / open / not applicable
Questions buyers should still ask
Match comparable versions: what should the buyer retain?
Retain the dated document, image or test result that closes “Match comparable versions”, together with the VIN and the name of the person who supplied or checked it. A listing label alone is not sufficient evidence.
Evaluate urban priorities: what should the buyer retain?
For “Evaluate urban priorities”, write down what is verified and what remains an assumption. An open point may be acceptable, but it must stay visible in the price, inspection scope or handover conditions.
Check transmission preference: what should the buyer retain?
Recheck “Check transmission preference” if the vehicle, destination, route or responsible supplier changes. Conclusions belong to the candidate and dated evidence set; they should not be copied to a replacement VIN.