NOTE 16 / COMPARE

Compare the Livan X3 Pro with the Geely Coolray

These are different buyer propositions. The X3 Pro is commonly a compact, naturally aspirated 1.5L front-drive value choice, while many Coolray versions use more powerful turbocharged powertrains and different equipment. Compare exact versions instead of transferring Coolray specifications into an X3 Pro listing.

The purpose of this worksheet is to turn a broad model-name search into a decision that can be checked, quoted and handed over without silently changing assumptions.

01

Separate the powertrains

Confirm engine induction, output, transmission and drive from each VIN. Incorrect reseller pages sometimes describe the X3 Pro with Coolray-style turbo and DCT data, which distorts price and maintenance comparisons.

Record: Save the source, capture date and VIN reference beside this finding so another candidate cannot inherit it by mistake.

02

Compare use rather than status

For dense city driving, parking, simple daily transport and purchase budget, the X3 Pro may fit. A buyer prioritising acceleration, equipment or a different cabin package may prefer a Coolray version.

Record: Enter the verified value and the evidence owner. If the seller supplied the answer, label it seller-stated until independently checked.

03

Price maintenance complexity

Naturally aspirated, CVT or manual hardware and turbo/DCT combinations create different fluids, diagnostic and parts requirements. Local technician familiarity matters as much as brochure performance.

Record: Record what was inspected, what remained inaccessible and who performed the check; silence is an open item, not a pass.

04

Measure the actual cabins

Seat comfort, luggage access, child-seat use and visibility should be tested on the candidates. Marketing segment labels do not replace dimensions or a practical use check.

Record: Note every destination assumption behind this conclusion and reopen it when the port, buyer country or registration route changes.

05

Inspect both independently

A newer or more powerful vehicle is not automatically in better condition. Apply the same VIN, body, underbody, diagnostic, tyre and service-history review to both.

Record: Attach the supporting photograph, report page or document reference and preserve the original language where translation could alter meaning.

06

Compare the complete route

Add registration confidence, preparation, freight, tax, parts and likely ownership costs. State which benefits are verified features and which remain preferences.

Record: State the commercial consequence: accept, reject, reprice or request more evidence, together with the person responsible and deadline.

Close the note with a decision record

Write the selected candidate, rejected alternatives, evidence reviewed, unresolved questions, responsible person and next deadline. If another vehicle replaces the candidate, reopen identity, inspection, cost and destination checks. A copied conclusion is not valid for a different VIN.

  • Separate the powertrains: confirmed / open / not applicable
  • Compare use rather than status: confirmed / open / not applicable
  • Price maintenance complexity: confirmed / open / not applicable
  • Measure the actual cabins: confirmed / open / not applicable
  • Inspect both independently: confirmed / open / not applicable
  • Compare the complete route: confirmed / open / not applicable

Questions buyers should still ask

Separate the powertrains: what should the buyer retain?

Retain the dated document, image or test result that closes “Separate the powertrains”, together with the VIN and the name of the person who supplied or checked it. A listing label alone is not sufficient evidence.

Compare use rather than status: what should the buyer retain?

For “Compare use rather than status”, write down what is verified and what remains an assumption. An open point may be acceptable, but it must stay visible in the price, inspection scope or handover conditions.

Price maintenance complexity: what should the buyer retain?

Recheck “Price maintenance complexity” if the vehicle, destination, route or responsible supplier changes. Conclusions belong to the candidate and dated evidence set; they should not be copied to a replacement VIN.